Campaign for Document Freedom - Revision history

Missing actor: /* Campaigners */

2008-08-15T12:26:37Z

Campaigners

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 15 August 2008
Line 171:		Line 171:
	# [[User:kishoreasok\|Kishore A]]		# [[User:kishoreasok\|Kishore A]]
	# [[User:sharath\|Sharath Shashidhar]]		# [[User:sharath\|Sharath Shashidhar]]
	# [[User:Jay Kiran\|Jay Kiran]]		# [[User:Jay Kiran\|Jay Kiran]]# [[User:AniVar\|Sharath Shashidhar]]
	# [[User:Pradeepinrvce\| Pradeep]]		# [[User:Pradeepinrvce\| Pradeep]]
	# [[User:Rao.nischal\| Nischal]]		# [[User:Rao.nischal\| Nischal]]
Line 220:		Line 220:
	# [[User: keralafarmer \| Chandrasekharan Nair S]]		# [[User: keralafarmer \| Chandrasekharan Nair S]]
	# [[User:BaijuMuthukadan\|BaijuMuthukadan]] 06:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)		# [[User:BaijuMuthukadan\|BaijuMuthukadan]] 06:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
			# [[User:Shiv\|Shivraj Kattimani]]
	[[Category:Campaigns]]		[[Category:Campaigns]]

Pravs: India and Brazil File Appeals Against OOXML Standardization

2008-05-31T04:32:39Z

India and Brazil File Appeals Against OOXML Standardization

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:02, 31 May 2008
Line 144:		Line 144:

	===International===		===International===
			*[http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/146468/india_and_brazil_file_appeals_against_ooxml_standardization.html India and Brazil File Appeals Against OOXML Standardization]
	* [http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-61468/south-africa-appeals-against-ooxml-call-your-standards-body-now South Africa appeals against OOXML, call your Standards Body now!]		* [http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-61468/south-africa-appeals-against-ooxml-call-your-standards-body-now South Africa appeals against OOXML, call your Standards Body now!]
	* [http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=753&blogid=14 Has OOXML Broken the British Standards Institution?]		* [http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=753&blogid=14 Has OOXML Broken the British Standards Institution?]

Pravs: /* International */ South Africa appeals against OOXML, call your Standards Body now!

2008-05-24T03:57:42Z

International: South Africa appeals against OOXML, call your Standards Body now!

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:27, 24 May 2008
Line 144:		Line 144:

	===International===		===International===
			* [http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-61468/south-africa-appeals-against-ooxml-call-your-standards-body-now South Africa appeals against OOXML, call your Standards Body now!]
	* [http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=753&blogid=14 Has OOXML Broken the British Standards Institution?]		* [http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=753&blogid=14 Has OOXML Broken the British Standards Institution?]
	* [http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=293507&cid=20548069 Aaron Siego's reply to Miguel]		* [http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=293507&cid=20548069 Aaron Siego's reply to Miguel]

Pravs: /* International */ Has OOXML Broken the British Standards Institution?

2008-05-03T19:34:24Z

International: Has OOXML Broken the British Standards Institution?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 4 May 2008
Line 144:		Line 144:

	===International===		===International===
			* [http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=753&blogid=14 Has OOXML Broken the British Standards Institution?]
	* [http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=293507&cid=20548069 Aaron Siego's reply to Miguel]		* [http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=293507&cid=20548069 Aaron Siego's reply to Miguel]
	* [http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/ The Norway Vote - What really happened]		* [http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/ The Norway Vote - What really happened]

Pravs: Aaron Siego explains the need of document freedom

2008-04-25T13:31:32Z

Aaron Siego explains the need of document freedom

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 25 April 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	"Previous proprietary document formats have become difficult or impossible to read within little more than a decade. There is no reason to believe this trend will not continue if allowed so to do. Without open standards for our documents we are likely to inflict a 'digital dark-age' on our descendants when they discover that they are unable to read any of the sources for their history, such as Government records, acts of Parliament, property title deeds, scientific research papers, and family histories. They will not forgive us if we fail to		"Previous proprietary document formats have become difficult or impossible to read within little more than a decade. There is no reason to believe this trend will not continue if allowed so to do. Without open standards for our documents we are likely to inflict a 'digital dark-age' on our descendants when they discover that they are unable to read any of the sources for their history, such as Government records, acts of Parliament, property title deeds, scientific research papers, and family histories. They will not forgive us if we fail to
	act to protect them now, but instead allow another generation of poorly specified proprietary standards to become widely adopted." - from [http://www.ukuug.org/ooxml/ UKUUG press release]		act to protect them now, but instead allow another generation of poorly specified proprietary standards to become widely adopted." - from [http://www.ukuug.org/ooxml/ UKUUG press release]

			"In the case of document format storage, a standard is truly important because formats (poor or not) that eventually lose implementations over time carve out blank spaces in our history once we can't read them properly. These same formats are also the source of certain information inequalities in society (e.g. those who can't obtain an implementation for financial, social or political reasons). This may not matter so much for Acme Inc's quarterly reports but it sure does for government, health and other socially vital information. Remember when some hurricane Katrina victims couldn't use the FEMA website because they had slightly older computers? This isn't a made up boogyman, this is stuff that bites us as a society fairly regularly. Now imagine a hundred years from now when we can still read the constitutions of our countries, research papers, poetry and other examples of human kind's great literary works that are hundreds or even thousands of years old ... but can't read the documents we're creating at the start of the 21st century. How will we learn from our history if we can't study it fully?

			Getting proprietary formats out of the way as soon as possible so that we do not extend this mess any further than necessary is absolutely the responsible thing to do in light of our (hopeful) future." - [http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=293507&cid=20548069 Aaron Siego]

	'''Document Freedom and Democracy'''		'''Document Freedom and Democracy'''
Line 140:		Line 144:

	===International===		===International===
			* [http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=293507&cid=20548069 Aaron Siego's reply to Miguel]
	* [http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/ The Norway Vote - What really happened]		* [http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/ The Norway Vote - What really happened]
	* [http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/04/sinclairs-syndrome.html Sinclair's Syndrome] - "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."		* [http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/04/sinclairs-syndrome.html Sinclair's Syndrome] - "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."

Pravs: /* Banners/Posters/Slogans */ OOXML: "The best Standard money can buy"

2008-04-22T06:17:28Z

Banners/Posters/Slogans: OOXML: "The best Standard money can buy"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 22 April 2008
Line 126:		Line 126:
	==Banners/Posters/Slogans==		==Banners/Posters/Slogans==
	* Slogans - [[:Image:Placard.odt\| odt]] [[:Image:Placard.pdf\| pdf]]		* Slogans - [[:Image:Placard.odt\| odt]] [[:Image:Placard.pdf\| pdf]]

			'''OOXML: "The best Standard money can buy"'''

	==Articles/Blogs==		==Articles/Blogs==

Pravs at 11:26, 21 April 2008

2008-04-21T11:26:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 21 April 2008
Line 44:		Line 44:
	So they all rolled over and 2 fell out…		So they all rolled over and 2 fell out…

	There was 1 in the bed and the little one said, “Norway votes Yes!”''' - [http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/ Steve Pepper], the Chairman of the Norwegian mirror committee for SC34 (K185) for 13 years until resigning a couple of weeks ago in protest against Standard Norway’s decision to vote Yes.		There was 1 in the bed and the little one said, “Norway votes Yes!”'''

			by [http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/ Steve Pepper], the Chairman of the Norwegian mirror committee for SC34 (K185) for 13 years until resigning a couple of weeks ago in protest against Standard Norway’s decision to vote Yes.

	==Events==		==Events==

Pravs: Rigged ISO process

2008-04-21T11:23:37Z

Rigged ISO process

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, 21 April 2008
Line 32:		Line 32:

	For users, the benefit of a standard is to have compatibility between competing products in the market. As soon as there are two or several standards for the same applications, these are no longer standards, but mere technical specifications. If there had been only one ISO-approved format, it would have been a means to relaunch competition and innovation in the office productivity market. if there are several, the situation remains the same as in the past. The existence of a dual standard doesn't bring anything more than the absence of a standard. - [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080419005201783 Frédéric Couchet], APRIL, the main French advocacy association devoted to promote and protect Free/Libre Software.		For users, the benefit of a standard is to have compatibility between competing products in the market. As soon as there are two or several standards for the same applications, these are no longer standards, but mere technical specifications. If there had been only one ISO-approved format, it would have been a means to relaunch competition and innovation in the office productivity market. if there are several, the situation remains the same as in the past. The existence of a dual standard doesn't bring anything more than the absence of a standard. - [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080419005201783 Frédéric Couchet], APRIL, the main French advocacy association devoted to promote and protect Free/Libre Software.

			'''Rigged ISO Process'''

			'''There were 30 in the bed and the little one said, “Roll over, roll over.”
			So they all rolled over and 23 fell out.

			There were 7 in the bed and the little one said, “Roll over, roll over.”
			So they all rolled over and 4 fell out.

			There were 3 in the bed and the little one said, “Roll over, roll over.”
			So they all rolled over and 2 fell out…

			There was 1 in the bed and the little one said, “Norway votes Yes!”''' - [http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/ Steve Pepper], the Chairman of the Norwegian mirror committee for SC34 (K185) for 13 years until resigning a couple of weeks ago in protest against Standard Norway’s decision to vote Yes.

	==Events==		==Events==

Pravs: /* International */ The Norway Vote - What really happened

2008-04-21T11:18:57Z

International: The Norway Vote - What really happened

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 21 April 2008
Line 123:		Line 123:

	===International===		===International===
			* [http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/ The Norway Vote - What really happened]
	* [http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/04/sinclairs-syndrome.html Sinclair's Syndrome] - "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."		* [http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/04/sinclairs-syndrome.html Sinclair's Syndrome] - "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
	* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080415150233162 ISO puts out a face-saving (it hopes) FAQ]		* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080415150233162 ISO puts out a face-saving (it hopes) FAQ]

Pravs: The role of standards

2008-04-20T13:10:44Z

The role of standards

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 20 April 2008
Line 27:		Line 27:
	The public cares about ODF, because it realizes it will impact every one of us directly, and we see the obvious, that OOXML is a spoiler. This has nothing to do with market share.		The public cares about ODF, because it realizes it will impact every one of us directly, and we see the obvious, that OOXML is a spoiler. This has nothing to do with market share.

	Courtesy: [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080414181840439 PJ @ groklaw]		Courtesy: [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080414181840439 PJ @ groklaw]

			'''The role of standards'''

			For users, the benefit of a standard is to have compatibility between competing products in the market. As soon as there are two or several standards for the same applications, these are no longer standards, but mere technical specifications. If there had been only one ISO-approved format, it would have been a means to relaunch competition and innovation in the office productivity market. if there are several, the situation remains the same as in the past. The existence of a dual standard doesn't bring anything more than the absence of a standard. - [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080419005201783 Frédéric Couchet], APRIL, the main French advocacy association devoted to promote and protect Free/Libre Software.

	==Events==		==Events==

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:56, 15 August 2008
Line 171:		Line 171:
	# [[User:kishoreasok\|Kishore A]]		# [[User:kishoreasok\|Kishore A]]
	# [[User:sharath\|Sharath Shashidhar]]		# [[User:sharath\|Sharath Shashidhar]]
	# [[User:Jay Kiran\|Jay Kiran]]		# [[User:Jay Kiran\|Jay Kiran]]# [[User:AniVar\|Sharath Shashidhar]]
	# [[User:Pradeepinrvce\| Pradeep]]		# [[User:Pradeepinrvce\| Pradeep]]
	# [[User:Rao.nischal\| Nischal]]		# [[User:Rao.nischal\| Nischal]]
Line 220:		Line 220:
	# [[User: keralafarmer \| Chandrasekharan Nair S]]		# [[User: keralafarmer \| Chandrasekharan Nair S]]
	# [[User:BaijuMuthukadan\|BaijuMuthukadan]] 06:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)		# [[User:BaijuMuthukadan\|BaijuMuthukadan]] 06:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
			# [[User:Shiv\|Shivraj Kattimani]]
	[[Category:Campaigns]]		[[Category:Campaigns]]