Say No To Software Patents/PressRelease - Revision history

Missing actor at 07:42, 22 August 2008

2008-08-22T07:42:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 22 August 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:
	# Renuka Prasad +91 9901945674		# Renuka Prasad +91 9901945674
	# Vikram vincent +91 9448810822		# Vikram vincent +91 9448810822


			[http://digg.com/tech_news/Bangaloreans_Say_No_to_Software_Patents Digg this]

Missing actor at 07:34, 22 August 2008

2008-08-22T07:34:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:04, 22 August 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	While the draft in circulation glosses over the fact that software is not patentable in law, it instructs people that software patents can be filed in combination with hardware. The manual is trying to permit something that is explicitly forbidden by the Indian Patent Act, 2005. Further, it is amusing the way the manual tries to get around the legal obstacle posed by the Patents Act, by positing a category of "software in combination with hardware" . It leads one to wonder whether software can exist independent of hardware		While the draft in circulation glosses over the fact that software is not patentable in law, it instructs people that software patents can be filed in combination with hardware. The manual is trying to permit something that is explicitly forbidden by the Indian Patent Act, 2005. Further, it is amusing the way the manual tries to get around the legal obstacle posed by the Patents Act, by positing a category of "software in combination with hardware" . It leads one to wonder whether software can exist independent of hardware

	In this regard, former Supreme Court Judge, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer has commented that		In this regard, former Supreme Court Judge, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer has commented that "neither the controller nor the central government has authority or sanction of law to publish a manual of the kind put on the website".
	"neither the controller nor the central government has authority or sanction of law to publish a manual
	of the kind put on the website".

	The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out that software is a form of knowledge and software patents would amount to propertisation of knowledge and would be detrimental to the pace at which software is growing. Software patents further kill innovation and competition. As software today pervades all walks of life, any dent in the pace of its growth would have a cascading effect on the economy in general.		The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out that software is a form of knowledge and software patents would amount to propertisation of knowledge and would be detrimental to the pace at which software is growing. Software patents further kill innovation and competition and turn software publishing into the privilege of a few. As software today pervades all walks of life, any dent in the pace of its growth would have a cascading effect on the economy in general.

	The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out to the lobby that is trying to push for software patents through the back door that;		The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out to the lobby that is trying to push for software patents through the back door that;

Missing actor at 07:25, 22 August 2008

2008-08-22T07:25:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 22 August 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			'''Bangaloreans Say No to Software Patents'''

	On 23rd August, 2008, a group of Bangaloreans is to gather outside Town Hall to protest software Patents under the aegis of Free Software Users Group, Bangalore at 5.30 PM.		On 23rd August, 2008, a group of Bangaloreans is to gather outside Town Hall to protest software Patents under the aegis of Free Software Users Group, Bangalore at 5.30 PM.

117.192.99.126 at 07:23, 22 August 2008

2008-08-22T07:23:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 22 August 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''Bangaloreans Say No to Software Patents'''~~		On 23rd August, 2008, a group of Bangaloreans is to gather outside Town Hall to protest software Patents under the aegis of Free Software Users Group, Bangalore at 5.30 PM.


	On 23rd August, 2008, a group of Bangaloreans ~~are~~ to gather outside Town Hall to protest software Patents under the aegis of Free Software Users Group, Bangalore at 5.30 PM.

	This protest comes in the wake of attempts by the Indian Patent Office to push software patents, despite the same having been rejected categorically by the Parliament of India in March, 2005. At that time a particular lobby had tried pushing Patents for Software through a Presidential Ordinance. This having fallen through, software patents are now being pushed through the back door in the form of a manual ostensibly to help people file patents.		This protest comes in the wake of attempts by the Indian Patent Office to push software patents, despite the same having been rejected categorically by the Parliament of India in March, 2005. At that time a particular lobby had tried pushing Patents for Software through a Presidential Ordinance. This having fallen through, software patents are now being pushed through the back door in the form of a manual ostensibly to help people file patents.

	While the draft in circulation glosses over the fact that ~~softwares are~~ not patentable in law, it instructs people that software patents can be filed in combination with hardware. The manual is trying to permit something that is explicitly forbidden by the Indian Patent Act, 2005. Further, it is amusing the way manual tries to get around the legal obstacle posed by the Patents Act, by positing a category of "software in combination with hardware" . It leads one to wonder whether software can exist independent of hardware		While the draft in circulation glosses over the fact that software is not patentable in law, it instructs people that software patents can be filed in combination with hardware. The manual is trying to permit something that is explicitly forbidden by the Indian Patent Act, 2005. Further, it is amusing the way the manual tries to get around the legal obstacle posed by the Patents Act, by positing a category of "software in combination with hardware" . It leads one to wonder whether software can exist independent of hardware

	In this regard, former Supreme Court Judge, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer has commented that		In this regard, former Supreme Court Judge, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer has commented that
Line 12:		Line 9:
	of the kind put on the website".		of the kind put on the website".

	The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out that software is a form of knowledge and software patents would amount to propertisation of knowledge and would be detrimental to the pace at which software is growing. Software patents further kill innovation and competition as software today pervades all walks of life, any dent in the pace of its growth would have a cascading effect on the economy in general.		The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out that software is a form of knowledge and software patents would amount to propertisation of knowledge and would be detrimental to the pace at which software is growing. Software patents further kill innovation and competition. As software today pervades all walks of life, any dent in the pace of its growth would have a cascading effect on the economy in general.

	The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out to the lobby that is trying to push for software patents through the back door that;		The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out to the lobby that is trying to push for software patents through the back door that;

	* Software is already protected under copyright law, and no additional protection either to individuals or industries is required		* Software is already protected under copyright law, and no additional protection either to individuals or industries is required
	* Hardware innovations are already patentable under the regular innovations therefore all innovators are already covered		* Hardware innovations are already patentable under the regular innovations; therefore all innovators are already covered
	* The current ICT revolution happened with science and technology under public domain and it is important for the growth of software that this remains so.		* The current ICT revolution happened with science and technology under public domain and it is important for the growth of software that this remains so.

Line 23:		Line 20:
	For Free Software users Group Bangalore		For Free Software users Group Bangalore

	Anivar Aravind		# Anivar Aravind +92 9449009908 /080 23435606
			# Praveen A +91 9986348565
	Praveen A		# Renuka Prasad +91 9901945674
			# Vikram vincent +91 9448810822
	Renuka Prasad

Missing actor at 04:44, 22 August 2008

2008-08-22T04:44:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 22 August 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:

	For Free Software users Group Bangalore		For Free Software users Group Bangalore

	Anivar Aravind		Anivar Aravind

	Praveen A		Praveen A

	Renuka Prasad		Renuka Prasad

Missing actor at 04:43, 22 August 2008

2008-08-22T04:43:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 22 August 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	In this regard, former Supreme Court Judge, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer has commented that		In this regard, former Supreme Court Judge, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer has commented that
	"neither the controller nor the central government has authority or sanction of law to publish a manual of the kind put on the website".		"neither the controller nor the central government has authority or sanction of law to publish a manual
			of the kind put on the website".

	The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out that software is a form of knowledge and software patents would amount to propertisation of knowledge and would be detrimental to the pace at which software is growing. Software patents further kill innovation and competition as software today pervades all walks of life, any dent in the pace of its growth would have a cascading effect on the economy in general.		The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out that software is a form of knowledge and software patents would amount to propertisation of knowledge and would be detrimental to the pace at which software is growing. Software patents further kill innovation and competition as software today pervades all walks of life, any dent in the pace of its growth would have a cascading effect on the economy in general.
Line 18:		Line 19:
	* Hardware innovations are already patentable under the regular innovations therefore all innovators are already covered		* Hardware innovations are already patentable under the regular innovations therefore all innovators are already covered
	* The current ICT revolution happened with science and technology under public domain and it is important for the growth of software that this remains so.		* The current ICT revolution happened with science and technology under public domain and it is important for the growth of software that this remains so.


	For Free Software users Group Bangalore		For Free Software users Group Bangalore
			Anivar Aravind
			Praveen A
	Anivar Aravind Praveen A Renuka Prasad		Renuka Prasad

Missing actor: Press Release

2008-08-22T04:43:02Z

Press Release

New page

'''Bangaloreans Say No to Software Patents'''

On 23rd August, 2008, a group of Bangaloreans are to gather outside Town Hall to protest software Patents under the aegis of Free Software Users Group, Bangalore at 5.30 PM.

This protest comes in the wake of attempts by the Indian Patent Office to push software patents, despite the same having been rejected categorically by the Parliament of India in March, 2005. At that time a particular lobby had tried pushing Patents for Software through a Presidential Ordinance. This having fallen through, software patents are now being pushed through the back door in the form of a manual ostensibly to help people file patents.

While the draft in circulation glosses over the fact that softwares are not patentable in law, it instructs people that software patents can be filed in combination with hardware. The manual is trying to permit something that is explicitly forbidden by the Indian Patent Act, 2005. Further, it is amusing the way manual tries to get around the legal obstacle posed by the Patents Act, by positing a category of "software in combination with hardware" . It leads one to wonder whether software can exist independent of hardware

In this regard, former Supreme Court Judge, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer has commented that
"neither the controller nor the central government has authority or sanction of law to publish a manual of the kind put on the website".

The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out that software is a form of knowledge and software patents would amount to propertisation of knowledge and would be detrimental to the pace at which software is growing. Software patents further kill innovation and competition as software today pervades all walks of life, any dent in the pace of its growth would have a cascading effect on the economy in general.

The Free Software Users Group also would like to point out to the lobby that is trying to push for software patents through the back door that;

* Software is already protected under copyright law, and no additional protection either to individuals or industries is required
* Hardware innovations are already patentable under the regular innovations therefore all innovators are already covered
* The current ICT revolution happened with science and technology under public domain and it is important for the growth of software that this remains so.

For Free Software users Group Bangalore

Anivar Aravind Praveen A Renuka Prasad