218
edits
Note: Currently new registrations are closed, if you want an account Contact us
Difference between revisions of "Bangalore/BMSCE/Understanding GPL version 3"
Bangalore/BMSCE/Understanding GPL version 3 (view source)
Revision as of 12:19, 16 May 2007
, 12:19, 16 May 2007no edit summary
(venue confirmed - BMSCE) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Date: 20th May 2007 | Date: 20th May 2007 | ||
Venue: [[Bangalore/BMSCE|BMS College of Engineering]] ([[Talk:Bangalore/BMSCE |directions to reach BMSCE]]) | Venue: [[Bangalore/BMSCE|BMS College of Engineering]] ([[Talk:Bangalore/BMSCE |directions to reach BMSCE]]) | ||
{|style="background:#ffdead;" | |||
|- | |||
|Another oft-heard objection to GPL3 is "GPL 2 is good enough!". But GPL has never stood alone, it has always depended on the local interpretation of copyright and other law to give it force, and those things change over time. | |||
When the GPL was written, there was no web, music came from phonograph records, video from tape, and rather than DRM there was rudimentary software "copy protection". The renaissance of microprocessors, software, the web and digital media worked a tremendous change in the law with many changes to copyright, patents, the nature of consent, contracts, tear-open licenses, and copyright permissions. And there have been many trials over those years that added interpretation to laws that GPL 2 depends upon. As the law changes, GPL must change to keep up with it, or it will become increasingly un-enforcible. [http://technocrat.net/d/2007/3/22/16651 Bruce Perens] | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
==Subtopics== | ==Subtopics== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 20: | ||
* Incompatibility with GPLv2 | * Incompatibility with GPLv2 | ||
* Tivoisation/DRM | * Tivoisation/DRM | ||
{|style="background:#ffdead;" | |||
|- | |||
|Confused objectors to GPL3 state that it won't allow the Linux kernel to be used on a system that implements DRM, and that GPL3 will compel manufacturers to "give away their keys". If Linus Torvalds and the kernel developers still believe this, they're wrong. [http://technocrat.net/d/2007/3/22/16651 Bruce Perens] | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
* Patents (Novell-Microsoft deal) | * Patents (Novell-Microsoft deal) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 32: | ||
# Read the [http://gplv3.fsf.org/gpl-draft-2007-03-28.html third discussion draft of the GNU General Public License version 3]. | # Read the [http://gplv3.fsf.org/gpl-draft-2007-03-28.html third discussion draft of the GNU General Public License version 3]. | ||
# Read the [http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/gplv3_linux_and.html discussion on GPLv3, Linux and GPLv2 compatibility on Alison Randall's blog] | # Read the [http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/gplv3_linux_and.html discussion on GPLv3, Linux and GPLv2 compatibility on Alison Randall's blog] | ||
# [http://technocrat.net/d/2007/3/22/16651 Bruce Perens clearing up FUD on GPLv3] | |||
==Participants== | ==Participants== | ||