SMC/AtomicChilluIsUnacceptable: Difference between revisions

Line 6:

The Atomic chillu's are unacceptable because it destroys the link of a chillu with its base character.

1. The examples used to justify semantic difference between words only separated by zwj are non-existent in dictionary or are grammatically wrong or meaningless without proper context.

1. The examples used to justify semantic difference between words only separated by zwj are non-existent in dictionary , not in are grammatically wrong or meaningless without proper context.

a) വന്‍യവനിക/വന്യവനിക (vanYavanika/vanyavanika), കണ്‍വലയം/കണ്വലയം (kanvalayam/kanualayam) ... contrived examples not found in dictionary

Line 18:

Structure:

ആ മനുഷ്യന്‍ <to whom & what he is gives> കൊടുക്കുന്നു

ആ മനുഷ്യന്‍ <to whom & what he gives> കൊടുക്കുന്നു

ആ മനുഷ്യനു് <who is giving & what is ~~giving~~> കൊടുക്കുന്നു.

ആ മനുഷ്യനു് <who is giving & what is being given> കൊടുക്കുന്നു.

Example:

Line 28:

to man) :-)

~~Fundamental~~ problem lies ~~here~~ in ~~the unicode~~'s way of treating only representational forms without checking linguistic correctness. Most of the ~~indic~~ languages are unlike ~~latin~~ and collations are based on ~~linguistic base~~. If you are not considering it, it will become a play yard of people with vested interests

Here , the fundamental problem lies in Unicode's way of treating only representational forms without checking linguistic correctness. Most of the Indic languages are unlike Latin and collations are based on linguistics. If you are not considering it, it will become a play yard of people with vested interests.

2. All these arguments were once considered and rejected by UTC and the only new argument in support of atomic chillus is the issue of missing domain names in IDN. The examples given in 1) can't be considered real as these are contrived just to make a case for atomic chillus. Even if were real it is similar to case folding in Latin (You can't register two sites PenIsland.com and PenisLand.com). How can already rejected proposal be accepted when the new arguments in supports is not only proved to be real, but creates a lot of new chaos and security problems.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 The Atomic chillu's are unacceptable because it destroys the link of a chillu with its base character.
-. The examples used to justify semantic difference between  words only separated by zwj are non-existent in dictionary or are grammatically wrong or meaningless without proper context.
+. The examples used to justify semantic difference between  words only separated by zwj are non-existent in dictionary , not in are grammatically wrong or meaningless without proper context.
 a) വന്‍യവനിക/വന്യവനിക (vanYavanika/vanyavanika), കണ്‍വലയം/കണ്വലയം (kanvalayam/kanualayam) ... contrived examples not found in dictionary
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Structure:
-ആ മനുഷ്യന്‍ <to whom & what he is gives>  കൊടുക്കുന്നു
+ആ മനുഷ്യന്‍ <to whom & what he gives>  കൊടുക്കുന്നു
-ആ മനുഷ്യനു്  <who is giving & what is giving> കൊടുക്കുന്നു.
+ആ മനുഷ്യനു്  <who is giving & what is being given> കൊടുക്കുന്നു.
 Example:
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 to man)   :-)
-Fundamental problem lies here in the unicode's way of treating only representational forms without checking linguistic correctness. Most  of the indic languages are unlike latin and collations are based on linguistic base. If you are not considering it, it will become a play yard of people with vested interests
+Here , the fundamental problem lies in Unicode's way of treating only representational forms without checking linguistic correctness. Most of the Indic languages are unlike Latin and collations are based on linguistics. If you are not considering it, it will become a play yard of people with vested interests.
 . All these arguments were once considered and rejected by UTC and the only new argument in support of atomic chillus is the issue of missing domain names in IDN. The examples given in 1) can't be considered real as these are contrived just to make a case for atomic chillus. Even if were real it is similar to case folding in Latin (You can't register two sites PenIsland.com and PenisLand.com). How can already rejected proposal be accepted when the new arguments in supports is not only proved to be real, but creates a lot of new chaos and security problems.