To register a new account on this wiki, contact us
FOSS project identification and indexing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some guidelines we have identified in an intra college discussion to evaluate the | Some guidelines we have identified in an intra college discussion to evaluate the projects were: | ||
# We could be looking at precisely the "contribution" and its worth in the contemporary scenario (relevance and significance). | # We could be looking at precisely the "contribution" and its worth in the contemporary scenario (relevance and significance). | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# Identify possible domains(broadly applications and system level) and classify projects to make evaluation easier and better. | # Identify possible domains(broadly applications and system level) and classify projects to make evaluation easier and better. | ||
The work now in pending is this | |||
# Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools). | # Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools). | ||
A list of possible tools can be of a variety of types, | |||
##Operating Systems | |||
###GNU/Linux | |||
###GNU/Hurd | |||
###ReactOS | |||
##Integrated Development Environments | |||
###Anjutha IDE for C/C++ development | |||
###Eclipse for Java | |||
###K Develop | |||
###Quanta Web Development Environment | |||
##Database Servers | |||
###MySQL Database sever | |||
###PostgreSQL | |||
##Web Servers | |||
###Apache | |||
##Support tools(CASE tools) | |||
###DIA | |||
###Umbrello UML modeller | |||
###cvs,svn(version control systems) | |||
(subject to discussion) | |||
# Then call for registering the projects with the staffs or students in charge. | # Then call for registering the projects with the staffs or students in charge. | ||
# Before doing this we have to prepare a detail of what should be there in the student applications (What all he/she have to specify). | # Before doing this we have to prepare a detail of what should be there in the student applications (What all he/she have to specify). | ||
* '''[http://groups.google.com/group/fci-education-discuss Discuss]''' | |||
Latest revision as of 15:10, 9 July 2007
Some guidelines we have identified in an intra college discussion to evaluate the projects were:
- We could be looking at precisely the "contribution" and its worth in the contemporary scenario (relevance and significance).
- We could also be looking at *ability to communicate* with development team, whose members are scattered - for which proof has to be produced (that will inspire other students, if the dialogues are simple)
- We could look at *tools* and/or modified tools that were used for the work
- We could also look at the fact whether the work is available in GPL (we are rewarding Free Software - not restricted/proprietary applications developed using Free Software).
- Identify possible domains(broadly applications and system level) and classify projects to make evaluation easier and better.
The work now in pending is this
- Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools).
A list of possible tools can be of a variety of types,
- Operating Systems
- GNU/Linux
- GNU/Hurd
- ReactOS
- Integrated Development Environments
- Anjutha IDE for C/C++ development
- Eclipse for Java
- K Develop
- Quanta Web Development Environment
- Database Servers
- MySQL Database sever
- PostgreSQL
- Web Servers
- Apache
- Support tools(CASE tools)
- DIA
- Umbrello UML modeller
- cvs,svn(version control systems)
- Operating Systems
(subject to discussion)
- Then call for registering the projects with the staffs or students in charge.
- Before doing this we have to prepare a detail of what should be there in the student applications (What all he/she have to specify).