To register a new account on this wiki, contact us

FOSS project identification and indexing: Difference between revisions

From FSCI Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:


# Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools).
# Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools).
A list of possible tools can be of a variety of types,
A list of possible tools can be of a variety of types,
##Operating Systems
##Operating Systems
##Programming Platforms
###GNU/Linux
###GNU/Hurd
###ReactOS
##Integrated Development Environments
##Integrated Development Environments
###Anjutha IDE for C/C++ development
###Eclipse for Java
###K Develop
###Quanta Web Development Environment
##Database Servers
##Database Servers
###MySQL Database sever
###PostgreSQL
##Web Servers
##Web Servers
##Programming Languages
###Apache
##Support tools(CASE tools)
##Support tools(CASE tools)
(add or delete if you wish)
###DIA
###Umbrello UML modeller
###cvs,svn(version control systems)
(subject to discussion)
# Then call for registering the projects with the staffs or students in charge.
# Then call for registering the projects with the staffs or students in charge.
# Before doing this we have to prepare a detail of what should be there in the student applications (What all he/she have to specify).
# Before doing this we have to prepare a detail of what should be there in the student applications (What all he/she have to specify).
* '''[http://groups.google.com/group/fci-education-discuss Discuss]'''

Latest revision as of 15:10, 9 July 2007

Some guidelines we have identified in an intra college discussion to evaluate the projects were:

  1. We could be looking at precisely the "contribution" and its worth in the contemporary scenario (relevance and significance).
  2. We could also be looking at *ability to communicate* with development team, whose members are scattered - for which proof has to be produced (that will inspire other students, if the dialogues are simple)
  3. We could look at *tools* and/or modified tools that were used for the work
  4. We could also look at the fact whether the work is available in GPL (we are rewarding Free Software - not restricted/proprietary applications developed using Free Software).
  5. Identify possible domains(broadly applications and system level) and classify projects to make evaluation easier and better.

The work now in pending is this

  1. Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools).

A list of possible tools can be of a variety of types,

    1. Operating Systems
      1. GNU/Linux
      2. GNU/Hurd
      3. ReactOS
    2. Integrated Development Environments
      1. Anjutha IDE for C/C++ development
      2. Eclipse for Java
      3. K Develop
      4. Quanta Web Development Environment
    3. Database Servers
      1. MySQL Database sever
      2. PostgreSQL
    4. Web Servers
      1. Apache
    5. Support tools(CASE tools)
      1. DIA
      2. Umbrello UML modeller
      3. cvs,svn(version control systems)

(subject to discussion)

  1. Then call for registering the projects with the staffs or students in charge.
  2. Before doing this we have to prepare a detail of what should be there in the student applications (What all he/she have to specify).