To register a new account on this wiki, contact us
FOSS project identification and indexing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some guidelines we have identified in an intra college discussion to evaluate the | Some guidelines we have identified in an intra college discussion to evaluate the projects were: | ||
# We could be looking at precisely the "contribution" and its worth in the contemporary scenario (relevance and significance). | # We could be looking at precisely the "contribution" and its worth in the contemporary scenario (relevance and significance). | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# Identify possible domains(broadly applications and system level) and classify projects to make evaluation easier and better. | # Identify possible domains(broadly applications and system level) and classify projects to make evaluation easier and better. | ||
The work now in pending is this | |||
# Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools). | # Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools). | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 23 April 2007
Some guidelines we have identified in an intra college discussion to evaluate the projects were:
- We could be looking at precisely the "contribution" and its worth in the contemporary scenario (relevance and significance).
- We could also be looking at *ability to communicate* with development team, whose members are scattered - for which proof has to be produced (that will inspire other students, if the dialogues are simple)
- We could look at *tools* and/or modified tools that were used for the work
- We could also look at the fact whether the work is available in GPL (we are rewarding Free Software - not restricted/proprietary applications developed using Free Software).
- Identify possible domains(broadly applications and system level) and classify projects to make evaluation easier and better.
The work now in pending is this
- Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools).
- Then call for registering the projects with the staffs or students in charge.
- Before doing this we have to prepare a detail of what should be there in the student applications (What all he/she have to specify).
please all of you join us and help us in this task