FOSS project identification and indexing: Difference between revisions
New page: Some guidelines we have identified in a intra college discussion to evaluate the projets were #. We could be looking at precisely the "contribution" and its worth in the contemporary scen... |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some guidelines we have identified in | Some guidelines we have identified in an intra college discussion to evaluate the projets were | ||
# | # We could be looking at precisely the "contribution" and its worth in the contemporary scenario (relevance and significance). | ||
# | # We could also be looking at *ability to communicate* with development team, whose members are scattered - for which proof has to be produced (that will inspire other students, if the dialogues are simple) | ||
# | # We could look at *tools* and/or modified tools that were used for the work | ||
# | # We could also look at the fact whether the work is available in GPL (we are rewarding Free Software - not restricted/proprietary applications developed using Free Software). | ||
# | # Identify possible domains(broadly applications and system level) and classify projects to make evaluation easier and better. | ||
the work now in pending is this | the work now in pending is this | ||
# | # Publishing of a potential list of tools or softwares which are available open (or identify the FOSS tools). | ||
# | # Then call for registering the projects with the staffs or students in charge. | ||
# | # Before doing this we have to prepare a detail of what should be there in the student applications (What all he/she have to specify). | ||
please all of you join us and help us in this task | please all of you join us and help us in this task | ||