Difference between revisions of "Anti-DRM-Campaign"

876 bytes added ,  20:47, 28 January 2007
Eben's comments added
(→‎DRM Elimination Crew: email signature)
(Eben's comments added)
Line 15: Line 15:
where your interest is perfectly legitimate and legal, and possibly
where your interest is perfectly legitimate and legal, and possibly
also for your own data," explains Georg Greve, FSFE's president. [http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q4/000157.html]
also for your own data," explains Georg Greve, FSFE's president. [http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2006q4/000157.html]
"the problem with restriction systems is that they require your computer to be under control of somebody other than you. In order to implement it up at layer seven, something that they want to achieve, we could argue what they are trying to achieve at layer seven is a good thing or a bad thing or it should be allowed or it shouldn't be allowed. My problem is that if they are gonna lock you down way back down layer zero inside the kernel inorder to achieve an effect at layer seven, you know what they are going to accomplish, a zillion unintented consequences or at any rate irrelevant consequences." - explains Eben Moglen, professor of law and history of law at Columbia University, serves pro bono as General Counsel for the Free Software Foundation, and is the Chairman of Software Freedom Law Center [http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Videos/Transcripts/ho-license_drm.mp4]


This page co-ordinates Indian DRM Elimination Campaign, to educate the consumers about the evils of DRM and initiate public debate on the same.
This page co-ordinates Indian DRM Elimination Campaign, to educate the consumers about the evils of DRM and initiate public debate on the same.