Jump to content

Navigation menu

Note: Currently new registrations are closed, if you want an account Contact us

Difference between revisions of "Palakkad/OpenStandardsPolicyComments"

link to list archive added
(Created page with 'To: Secretary IT, secretary at mit.gov.in, NASSCOM: chairman at nasscom.in, Mait: Vinnie Mehta <vinnie at mait.com> Economic Times: Harsimran Julka <harsimran.julka at gmail.com>...')
 
(link to list archive added)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
To: Secretary IT, secretary at mit.gov.in,
To: Shri R Chandrashekar, Secretary IT, secretary at mit.gov.in,
 
NASSCOM: chairman at nasscom.in,
NASSCOM: chairman at nasscom.in,
Mait: Vinnie Mehta <vinnie at mait.com>
Mait: Vinnie Mehta <vinnie at mait.com>
Economic Times: Harsimran Julka <harsimran.julka at gmail.com>
Economic Times: Harsimran Julka <harsimran.julka at gmail.com>


Subject: Comments on National Policy on Open Standards for e-Governance
Subject: Comments on National Policy on Open Standards for e-Governance


As members of Palakkad Libre Software Users Group (PLUS
Dear Sir,
 
As members of Palakkad Libre Software Users Society (PLUS
http://plus.sarovar.org), we would like to congratulate the Government
http://plus.sarovar.org), we would like to congratulate the Government
for coming up with a National Policy on Open Standards for
for coming up with a National Policy on Open Standards for
Line 29: Line 34:
this great initiative by adding loop holes into the policy to allow
this great initiative by adding loop holes into the policy to allow
patent encumbered and single entity controlled namesake open standards
patent encumbered and single entity controlled namesake open standards
to be showed in. But section 6.4 of the draft version 2.0 is completely negating the nature of the policy itself. When you have more than one standard in the same domain, it not only increase the effort required to implement all
to be showed in. Section 6.4 of the draft version 2.0 is completely negating the nature of the policy itself. When you have more than one standard in the same domain, it not only increase the effort required to implement all
competing standards, but ensuring perfect interoperability will be
competing standards, but ensuring perfect interoperability will be
near to impossible as there is going to be some loss of information
near to impossible as there is going to be some loss of information
Line 64: Line 69:
comments.
comments.


Praveen Arimbrathodiyil, Hiran Venugopalan
Praveen Arimbrathodiyil, Hiran Venugopalan, Santhosh Thottingal


Palakkad Libre Software Users Group (PLUS)
Palakkad Libre Software Users Society (PLUS)


http://plus.sarovar.org
http://plus.sarovar.org


Please make your changes before 11 July, so that we can send this in time. If anyone wants to add your names, please do it here.
[http://lists.sarovar.org/pipermail/plus-discuss/2009-July/000893.html Archive of the email]