Difference between revisions of "Videos/Transcripts/ho-license drm.mp4"

← Older edit

Videos/Transcripts/ho-license drm.mp4 (view source)

Revision as of 14:59, 23 January 2007

2,427 bytes added , 14:59, 23 January 2007

reached 44:14

Pravs

Bureaucrats, Administrators

218

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{|style="background:#ffdead;"
+|-
+|Help needed to complete this transcript. If you wanna join sign your section (say from 10minutes to 15mintes) in the [[Talk:Videos/Transcripts/ho-license_drm.mp4| talk page]].
+|-
+|}
 '''[http://www.rehash.nl/hollandopen/rawtapes/ho-license_drm/ho-license_drm.mp4 Download the video]'''
@@ Line 28: / Line 34: @@
 [Eben]
-Thank you. So let me tell you
+Thank you. So let me tell you I want to ...
+[Moderator interrupts]
+[Eben]
+:00 You get a question mark I promise. He took some time, he took some time to put forward his position. I thought it was a leaky position but irrelevent and now I want to take time to show why.
+[Arnold]
+Go ahead [smiles].
+[Eben]
+So the problem with restriction systems is that they require your computer to be under control of somebody other than you. In order to implement it up at layer seven, something that they want to achieve, we could argue what they are trying to achieve at layer seven is a good thing or a bad thing or it should be allowed or it shouldn't be allowed. My problem is that if they are gonna lock you down way back down layer zero inside the kernel inorder to achieve an effect at layer seven, you know what they are going to accomplish, a zillion unintented consequences or at any rate irrelevant consequences.
+:48 If they lock down every layer below the top in order to achieve a result at the top then they achieve a zillion consequences which are none of their legitimate business and which are harmful to our ability to make software.
+:02 It is the fundamental question, you get a computer, you put it on your business network, it doesn't allow you to read it, it doesn't allow you to change it, because if you change it, you are either breaking a criminal law or it is gonna stop working the way it was supposed to work.
+:21 And now it force you to talk to people in a way that you don't understand. And the idea is that you should put those on the table at work and you should bring that home and keep next to your kid who does his homework. WHY? Because we don't want people sharing music and movies in the wrong way. I don't want to talk about their objectives. Their objective is fine or not fine, I only want to talk about the obvious fact that this is no legitimate way to achieve this. We have to protect our rightd, which are our users rights, so we can continue to know what the software does, to modify it, to change it, to use it for its intented purpose without permission if we change it. Thats what we need, when Arnold want to talk about the issue, these are the issues he needs to talk about.
+:14