Jump to content

Navigation menu

Note: Currently new registrations are closed, if you want an account Contact us

Difference between revisions of "Campaign for Document Freedom"

many new links added
(Policy challenges for “Open Standards”)
 
(many new links added)
Line 61: Line 61:


==Articles/Blogs==
==Articles/Blogs==
===India Specific===
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2008/03/indias-comments-on-brm-to-iso.html India's comments on BRM to ISO]
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2007/08/policy-challenges-for-open-standards.html Policy challenges for “Open Standards”]
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2007/08/policy-challenges-for-open-standards.html Policy challenges for “Open Standards”]
* [http://www.ukuug.org/ooxml/ UKUUG seeks legal advice on BSI's OOXML decision]
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2008/03/microsoft-files-complaint-on-ooxml-vote.html Microsoft files complaint on OOXML vote to apex office and Ministry of Consumer Affairs]
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2008/03/microsoft-files-complaint-on-ooxml-vote.html Microsoft files complaint on OOXML vote to apex office and Ministry of Consumer Affairs]
* [http://ooxmlcritic.blogspot.com/2008/03/is-ooxml-really-open.html is ooxml really open?]
* [http://ooxmlcritic.blogspot.com/2008/03/is-ooxml-really-open.html is ooxml really open?]
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2008/03/india-votes-no-for-ooxml.html India votes NO for OOXML]
===International===
* [http://www.ukuug.org/ooxml/ UKUUG seeks legal advice on BSI's OOXML decision]
* [http://fsfeurope.org/documents/msooxml-questions Six questions to national standardisation bodies]
* [http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2008q2/000206.html FSFE concerned about quality of standardisation process]
* [http://government.zdnet.com/?p=3745 EU investigating OOXML vote]
* [http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/DFE3C11047741AFACC25741F003379BD Microsoft's ISO win may worsen antitrust woes]


==Campaigners==
==Campaigners==