Note: Currently new registrations are closed, if you want an account Contact us
Difference between revisions of "Syllabus Review"
→Colleges & Universities
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
| ''The following list is one that is observed across institutes for conducting practical sessions, but is not '''explicity''' mentioned in the syllabus. The course content for theory classes '''do not''' explicity or implicity refer to the use of these programs.'' | | ''The following list is one that is observed across institutes for conducting practical sessions, but is not '''explicity''' mentioned in the syllabus. The course content for theory classes '''do not''' explicity or implicity refer to the use of these programs.'' | ||
* Use of ''only'' Turbo C++ 3.0 (16-bit) compiler to write C / C++ programs (and VC++ later) | * Use of ''only'' Turbo C++ 3.0 (16-bit) compiler to write C / C++ programs (and VC++ later) | ||
* Visual Basic as a mandatory Subject in SEM V denying the merits of other Prototyping software | * Visual Basic as a mandatory Subject in SEM V (BSc[IT]) denying the merits of other Prototyping software | ||
* Use of Emulators (Wipro UWin) instead of *nix based distributions for practical sessions on *nix based subjects | * Use of Emulators (Wipro UWin) instead of *nix based distributions for practical sessions on *nix based subjects | ||
* Windows based OSes allowing "each one to his own" kinda behaviour for learning / spreading knowledge implying '''lack of standards''' for software across institutions / colleges teaching these courses. | * Windows based OSes allowing "each one to his own" kinda behaviour for learning / spreading knowledge implying '''lack of standards''' for software across institutions / colleges teaching these courses. | ||