218
edits
Difference between revisions of "Campaign for Document Freedom"
Campaign for Document Freedom (view source)
Revision as of 13:42, 13 April 2008
, 13:42, 13 April 2008many new links added
(Policy challenges for “Open Standards”) |
(many new links added) |
||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
==Articles/Blogs== | ==Articles/Blogs== | ||
===India Specific=== | |||
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2008/03/indias-comments-on-brm-to-iso.html India's comments on BRM to ISO] | |||
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2007/08/policy-challenges-for-open-standards.html Policy challenges for “Open Standards”] | * [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2007/08/policy-challenges-for-open-standards.html Policy challenges for “Open Standards”] | ||
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2008/03/microsoft-files-complaint-on-ooxml-vote.html Microsoft files complaint on OOXML vote to apex office and Ministry of Consumer Affairs] | * [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2008/03/microsoft-files-complaint-on-ooxml-vote.html Microsoft files complaint on OOXML vote to apex office and Ministry of Consumer Affairs] | ||
* [http://ooxmlcritic.blogspot.com/2008/03/is-ooxml-really-open.html is ooxml really open?] | * [http://ooxmlcritic.blogspot.com/2008/03/is-ooxml-really-open.html is ooxml really open?] | ||
* [http://osindia.blogspot.com/2008/03/india-votes-no-for-ooxml.html India votes NO for OOXML] | |||
===International=== | |||
* [http://www.ukuug.org/ooxml/ UKUUG seeks legal advice on BSI's OOXML decision] | |||
* [http://fsfeurope.org/documents/msooxml-questions Six questions to national standardisation bodies] | |||
* [http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2008q2/000206.html FSFE concerned about quality of standardisation process] | |||
* [http://government.zdnet.com/?p=3745 EU investigating OOXML vote] | |||
* [http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/DFE3C11047741AFACC25741F003379BD Microsoft's ISO win may worsen antitrust woes] | |||
==Campaigners== | ==Campaigners== | ||